var q dnaactivationmantrameaningAscension Energies Returning to Divine WholnessThe Danger of Excessive Vaccination During Brain Development. The Case for a Link to Autism Spectrum Disorders. By Russell L. Blaylock, M. D. In 1. 97. 6, children received 1. Today, they will receive over 3. The American Academy of Pediatrics and the Center for Disease Control and Prevention CDC assured parents that it was safe to not only give these vaccines, but that they could be given at one time with complete safety. Is this true Or are we being lied to on a grand scale The medical establishment has created a set of terms, which they use constantly to boost their egos and firm up their authority as the unique holders of medical wisdomthe mantra is evidence based medicine, as if everything outside their anointing touch is bogus and suspect. A careful examination of many of the accepted treatments reveals that most have little or no scientific evidence based data to support it. One often repeated study found that almost 8. This is not to say that medical practice should be purely based on pure and applied science, as understood in the fields of physics and chemistry. Spread the LOVE by Gregg Prescott, M. S. Editor, In5D. com According to Gregg Bradens research, we are only utilizing 22 of the 64 codons in our DNA. METAPHYSICS AND THE END OF RELIGIOUS CONFUSION You live in a world of religious confusion Judaism, Christianity, Islam, Zoroastrianism, Hinduism, Taoism. Medicine, as pointed out by many of the great men of medicine, is an art. For a discussion on the proper role of medicine, I refer the reader to my paper titled Regimentation in Medicine and the Death of Creativity on my website www. Russell. Blaylock. MD. com. The Scientific Double Standards of Vaccine Safety. Most men of medicine recognize that some things are obvious without a placebo controlled, double blind, randomized study. For example, there has never been such a study to see if smashing your finger with a hammer will be painful, but we accept it without such pristine evidence. The same is true with removing brain tumors or sewing up severe lacerations. I find it interesting that there exist an incredible double standard when it comes to our evidence versus theirs. The proponents of vaccination safety can just say they are safe, without any supporting evidence whatsoever, and it is to be accepted without question. They can announce that mercury is not only safe, but that it seems to actually increase the IQ, and we are to accept it. They can proclaim thimerosal safe to use in vaccines without their having ever been a single study on its safety in over 6. Yet, let me, or anyone else, suggest that excessive vaccination can increase the risk of not only autism, but also schizophrenia and neurodegenerative diseases, and they will scream like banshees Where is the evidenceWhere is the evidence When we produce study after study, they always proclaim them to be insufficient evidence or unacceptable studies. More often than not, they just completely ignore the evidence. This is despite the fact that we produce dozens or even hundreds of studies that not only demonstrate the link clinically and scientifically, but also clearly show the mechanism by which the damage is being done even on a molecular level. These include cell culture studies, mixed cell cultures, organotypic tissue studies, in vivo animal studies using multiple species and even human studies. To the defenders of vaccine safety our evidence is never sufficient and, if we face reality never will be. Scientific Nitpicking Costs Lives. When I was in medical school, there was no proof that cigarette smoking causes lung cancer. The connection was as obvious as the laymans observation that smashing your finger with a hammer would cause pain and even the town drunk knew it was true, but to the medical elite there was no proof. No one had ever produced lung cancer in animals by exposing them to cigarette smoke. In fact, my pathology professor, Dr. Jack Strong, had trained monkeys to chain smoke, and after years of smoking, none developed lung cancer. Yet, he was convinced that smoking caused lung cancer. Dr. Alton Oschner, founder of the famed Oschner Clinic in New Orleans, led the charge in proclaiming the link between cigarette smoking and lung cancer. It took almost another decade before the medical elite was willing to admit that smoking caused most cases of lung cancer. Almost 3. 0 years passed from the time some iconoclastic men of medicine tried to convince the medical establishment that smoking caused most cases of lung cancer until it was generally accepted. The question that needs to be asked is how many people died of lung cancer, the most prevalent cause of cancer death in the United States, during this time Data from the National Cancer Institute estimated that in the year 2. If 8. 0 percent were secondary to smoking, that would be 1. Over a ten year period, that would be over one million dead and over 3. Lung cancer death rates were actually higher during that time period. So we see that questions of medical importance that are nitpicked to death on points of scientific purity can cost a lot of lives millions of lives. The Compelling Link Between Autism and the Vaccination Program. There are over one million children and even adults with autism and the numbers continue to grow. This is a medial disaster of monumental proportions. The link to the vaccine program is scientifically and logically compelling but these same medical elitists refuse to listen. Like smoking and lung cancer, we have enough proof today to call a halt to the present excessive vaccine program and ban any level of mercury in vaccines. In 1. 98. 3, before the autism epidemic began, children received 1. Today, they are receiving 2. Medical experts have provided no other explanation for this dramatic and sudden rise in autism cases, despite a draconian effort to find one. They attempted to say it was genetic, but geneticists were quick to respond that genetic disorders do not suddenly increase in such astronomical proportions. They then said it was because of better diagnosis, despite the fact that the diagnosis is obvious in virtually every case and that the criteria officially accepted for diagnosis has become more restrictive not less. When trapped by a lack of evidence, defenders of a nefarious position resort to their old standby the epidemiological study. Statisticians will tell you that the least reliable type of study is an epidemiological study because it is easy to manipulate the data so that the study tells you anything you wish it to. Every defense offered by vaccine defenders is based on such studies and never the actual science. Then they announce that the issue is settled and no further studies need be done. After the media has been informed that the issue has been settled, those who continue to present the evidence are considered kooks and the great unwashed ignorant. The Autism Disaster Is It Man Made Today, specialists speak of the autism spectrum disorders ASD, which include a number of related neurodevelopmental disorders such as classical autism, Retts syndrome, Aspergers syndrome, childhood disintegrative disorder CDD, and pervasive developmental disorders not otherwise specified PDD NOS. I have noticed over the years that when specialists know very little about a disorder, they spend an inordinate amount of time naming and sub classifying it periodically. In addition, they go to great lengths to define characteristics and symptoms of the disorder that must be present to meet the criteria of classification. Those who fail to meet these criteria are dispensed with into another dimension, that is, they are ignored. In the early 1. 98. By 2. 00. 5, the incidence had leaped to 1 in 2.